AnneCarlini.com Home
 
  Giveaways!
  Insider Gossip
  Monthly Hot Picks
  Book Reviews
  CD Reviews
  Concert Reviews
  DVD Reviews
  Game Reviews
  Movie Reviews
  Check Out The NEW Anne Carlini Productions!
  Ben Cumberbatch & Olivia Colman [The Roses]
  Don Felder (Eagles) [2025]
  Fabienne Shine (Shakin’ Street)
  Crystal Gayle
  Ellen Foley
  The Home of WAXEN WARES Candles!
  Michigan Siding Company for ALL Your Outdoor Needs
  MTU Hypnosis for ALL your Day-To-Day Needs!
  COMMENTS FROM EXCLUSIVE MAGAZINE READERS!


©9097 annecarlini.com
DJ Supply

Movie Reviews
Flight Risk
(Mark Wahlberg, Michelle Dockery, Topher Grace, et al / R / 1hr 31mins / Lionsgate)

Overview: In this high-stakes suspense thriller, Academy Award® nominee Mark Wahlberg (Actor in a Supporting Role, 2006 -- The Departed) plays a pilot transporting an Air Marshal (Michelle Dockery) accompanying a fugitive (Topher Grace) to trial. As they cross the Alaskan wilderness, tensions soar and trust is tested, as not everyone on board is who they seem.

Verdict: Mel Gibson’s career has been quite remarkable. Coming very young off the success of the original Mad Max worldwide, the actor then went to Hollywood, where he became a movie star, and a respected film director, only to fumble under nasty declarations and political matters that put him on Hollywood’s blacklist.

However, it is undeniable that Gibson is immensely talented, and we expect a lot from him because he has given us greatness before. Sadly, Flight Risk is not the greatness we and he deserve.

From a script point of view, the film delivers quite an interesting and delightful premise that reminds us of Agatha Christie’s mystery thrillers, trying to find who is who and who will do what and when. These types of stories are pretty entertaining, and writers and filmmakers have made a career out of them.

Just look at what Rian Johnson is doing at Netflix with his Knives Out films, and yet, these stories, while fun, need to be well-researched and planned unless you want to make the audience angry.

Nowadays, audiences are very intelligent, media savvy, and can detect and predict many things happening at all times. While being unpredictable is great, it shouldn’t be the end goal of a film or story because even when a story is very predictable, audiences will forgive it or don’t care if it is well executed.

In the case of Flight Risk, the execution falls short for several reasons, including tone, acting, and not being committed enough to be what it should be: a thriller.

The script tries to assign too many things to too many characters, and while it works for some of them, you can definitely see that there are many characters who don’t serve a purpose or are even interesting. This creates the sensation that the film is wasting the audience’s time, and not being committed enough to the genre avoids giving the story the punch it needs to connect with audiences.

Instead of being a really intense thriller, which will probably be what audiences expect when watching this, the story also tries to be funny and lighthearted. It just doesn’t work as all these tries at being funny feels like filler, leaving the more interesting plot points only to receive just enough runtime to make the story work, sort of, and for a film that is just about the 90-minute mark, it becomes evident that the writer, Jared Rosenberg, just didn’t have enough story to cover 90 minutes. Compromises were made to stretch that runtime. [N.A.]





...Archives